What I am about to suggest is not based on anything but the Feds intrusive and thuggish behavior. For a minute, go back to the Supreme Court decision on Obama Care. Chief Justice Roberts was the swing vote in approval of The Affordable Care Act. He looked like he was up all night debating his final decision. Remember, he decided the Mandate was a tax and therefore Constitutional. Even though the Administration and all Democrats denied from the beginning it was a tax.
Consider recently, there are multiple scandals involving Government spying and keeping records on individuals. In addition, there were incidents of bullying or threatening individuals as with the IRS actions. Remember it was the IRS that released conservative donors to the Left so they could be targeted for harassment. That pattern is duplicated by the EPA. Our Government’s pattern is to take an illegal action, and initially deny, claiming no responsibility. Later fight exposure of the facts, distort facts and blame on others. (Does President Bush is at fault or also did it sound familiar?)
Based on all the above is it too far outside the box to make a hypothetical that asks the possibility that Chief Justice Roberts was in fact upset because the Government found something in their data mining about him or his family that was used to force him to vote in favor of Obama Care?
When Government fosters mistrust in both their words and actions anything is believable and possible.
Is this Possible? Is it Probable? Is it a Fairy Tale?